IU describes as "antisocial" the new ordinance Coexistence of Navasfrías.
Speaking to a local radio station the day C.Rodrigo 04/12/2013, Mayor Celso Ramos ,has stated that the economic level of fines that are retouched and accepts its share.
The City of Navasfrías wants to regulate a Ordinance Security and Coexistence, the distribution of advertising and placement of advertising elements, the ban on wearing loose animals, or noise issues.
For United Left, the content of the ordinance is "antisocial”, by the prohibitions and penalties are fixed for some concepts, This has led to the formation to present a series of arguments. Remember that IU has no representation in the Full Council Navasfrías.
As highlights, IU stresses that the ordinance was intended to prohibit the distribution of advertising and placement of advertising elements, "Undifferentiated one that has a commercial character which responds to exercise fundamental rights". IU is surprised by the fact that a municipality governed by the PSOE seeks to prohibit any advertising element, without distinction, for example, between an illuminated sign and information sign a partnership.
Also related to advertising, Ordinance seeks to regulate the parking of vehicles "labeled with advertising" that are not discharged in Vehicle Road Tax for a longer period to 2 days.
Vehicles around, IU explained that the Ordinance gives the City Council the power to decide "what vehicle may or may not run on its municipal, obviating that there are issues beyond their competence ". According to point from IU, this regulation is specific to the Vehicle Inspection.
Regarding noise, ordinance includes sanctions up to 500 € for "closing the doors or windows so noisy" or "loud talking" in the houses at certain times. IU stresses that control these noises, although it may be reasonable in the night time, require "a sound measurement", not to mention the fact that "Navasfrías, has a population of 500 people.
For these aspects mentioned, IU think that the ordinance is "nonsense" that only has "a populist target, proposing tough instead of emphasizing positive proposals to improve coexistence ".
The training also emphasizes that the Ordinance includes proposals that have already been declared illegal by the High Court of Justice.
